Calculate the true cost of manual billing work

Routine billing tasks quietly consume hours each week. See what that time is really worth.

Where is your billing time leaking?

Answer 5 quick questions to get a personalized estimate of how much time and revenue your team could recover each month.

0-1011-2021-3031-4041-6061+
0-1011-2021-3031-4041-6061+

* Estimates based on conservative industry benchmarks (45% efficiency reduction, 25 hrs/client); revenue represents top-line potential before costs. Actual profit depends on your margin, which most billing companies (80%) report at 0-20%.

You're leaving on the table:

Labor savings: $XX/month

Revenue from additional clients:

$XX/month

Here's how that adds up ↓

Time spent on repetitive manual tasks

Your team spends XX hours hours per week on payment posting, eligibility, and denial work, costing $XX/year in staffing.

Room to take on new clients

Those XX hours equal XX FTE, capacity that could support XX additional clients.

What reducing rework could unlock

At a conservative 45% efficiency estimate, you could save XX hours/week hours/week and unlock $XX/month in potential value.

Cut denials. Get time back. Strengthen your cash flow.

Tebra’s connected billing and clinical workflows help private practices reduce rework, collect payments faster, and reclaim hours each week.

Take a self-guided tour

Explore Tebra’s billing tools, from real-time eligibility checks to automated ERA posting and denial workflows.

Get a workflow assessment

See how Tebra helps billing companies streamline posting, eligibility, and denials – all while spending less time on billing tasks.

Schedule a meeting with sales

Talk to an expert about billing automation, workflow optimization, and getting paid faster.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

The true cost of manual medical billing work includes both direct labor expense and lost revenue opportunity. Most billing companies underestimate the full impact because manual tasks:
  • Require highly paid staff time for repetitive processes
  • Increase the risk of denials and rework
  • Delay reimbursements and cash flow
  • Limit your capacity to onboard additional clients

In practical terms, manual work cost = (Weekly hours × hourly rate × 48 working weeks) Plus the revenue you could earn using that time more strategically This calculator quantifies:
  • Annual labor cost tied to manual posting, eligibility, and denial work
  • Monthly labor savings from reducing manual effort
  • Revenue potential from adding new client practices
Billing teams often spend 30–50% of their operational time on manual workflows. Breakdown across most billing companies:
  • Payment + ERA posting: 5–15 hours per biller per week
  • Eligibility verification: 5–10 hours per week
  • Denial triage + research: 5–12 hours per week

That adds up quickly — especially when multiple team members are involved. Manual processes usually include:
  • Reviewing ERA exceptions
  • Manual claim matching
  • Coverage checks
  • Payer rule research
  • Resubmission preparation

Industry benchmarks suggest workflow automation can reduce manual task time by 40–65%, which is why this calculator uses a conservative 45% reduction assumption.
Reducing manual billing work increases revenue by freeing up staff capacity to service more client practices. Here’s the math logic:
  • Automation reduces repetitive task time.
  • Freed hours convert into available FTE capacity.
  • That capacity can support additional practices.
  • Additional practices = additional monthly recurring revenue.

The calculator uses a benchmark of:
  • ~25 hours per client per month (industry range: 20–30 hours)

So if automation frees 50 hours per month:
  • That equals capacity for 2 additional practices
  • Multiplied by your average monthly revenue per client

This revenue potential is separate from direct labor savings — and often exceeds it.
Yes, workflow automation commonly reduces manual billing task time by 40–65%. Time savings come from:
  • Automated ERA posting
  • Real-time eligibility verification
  • Claim scrubbing before submission
  • Automated denial identification
  • Rule-based workflow routing

However, results depend on:
  • Payer mix
  • Client complexity
  • Current workflow design
  • Staff adoption

That’s why this calculator provides directional estimates, not guaranteed savings.