• 92% of patients are asked to refill the same intake paperwork at least once a year, and 37% (more than 1 in 3) refill it 3 or more times per year.
  • Nearly 1 in 5 patients (19%) have provided inaccurate or incomplete information on intake forms because the process feels repetitive or rushed.
  • 27% of patients have delayed, canceled, or avoided a medical appointment because they didn’t want to deal with the paperwork.
  • 45% of patients would use an AI assistant to auto-populate their medical intake forms.
  • 13 hours per week are spent per practice processing, correcting, or following up on patient intake paperwork, equivalent to nearly 4 months of full-time work per year.

Medical intake is a routine part of care, but it often creates friction for both patients and providers. From repeated forms to manual data entry, the process can slow down visits and introduce errors that affect care quality. 

Tebra surveyed 703 patients and 298 United States healthcare professionals in April 2026 to better understand how intake paperwork impacts experiences and where AI may fit in. The findings highlight both the burden of today’s systems and the nuanced expectations shaping the future of automation in private practices.

Repetitive paperwork is wearing patients down

Even before a visit begins, administrative tasks can shape how patients feel about their care experience.

Infographic titled “The clipboard tax” showing the burden of repetitive medical intake paperwork. It states that 92% of patients refill the same forms at least once a year, 37% do so three or more times annually, and intake paperwork takes over 20 minutes for 15% of new-provider visits. The infographic also notes that nearly 1 in 5 patients submit inaccurate or incomplete information due to rushed or repetitive forms, with the most common errors involving family medical history (13%) and medical history/past conditions (11%). It concludes that 27% of patients have delayed, canceled, or avoided medical appointments because of paperwork.

A striking 92% of patients reported being asked to refill the same intake paperwork at least once a year, with 37% completing it 3 or more times annually. This repetition added friction to what should be a straightforward process and contributed to growing frustration across all generations.

That fatigue showed up in patient behavior. About 27% of patients said they delayed, canceled, or avoided an appointment altogether to avoid paperwork, with higher rates among younger groups including:

  • Gen Z (38%)
  • Millennials (29%)
  • Gen X (22%)
  • Baby Boomers (14%)

The pressure to complete forms quickly also affected data quality. Nearly 1 in 5 patients admitted they had provided inaccurate or incomplete information because the process felt rushed or repetitive, increasing the risk of downstream issues in care delivery.

Operationally, many patients adjusted their routines to cope. More than half, 54%, said they often or always arrived early to complete paperwork, yet 27% reported that arriving early made their appointment experience worse, underscoring how intake processes can negatively shape the overall patient journey.

Where patients draw the line on AI-powered intake

Interest in automation is growing, but comfort levels vary depending on how AI is used and who it affects.

Infographic titled “The AI threshold” showing patient attitudes toward AI-assisted medical intake forms. It reports that 45% of patients would use an AI assistant for intake forms, while 39% would not and 16% are unsure. The graphic also highlights concerns about AI accessing wearable device data (45%), connected health apps (42%), insurance files (40%), and previous visit records (35%). Additional data shows that 47% would not allow AI to read their entire medical record and 54% would not let AI fill out a child’s intake forms. Trust in AI intake tools would increase with a review-and-approve step before visits (60%), endorsement from a doctor’s office (34%), or support from an insurance company (28%).

Nearly half of patients, 45%, said they would use an AI assistant to auto-populate their medical intake forms. Adoption increased with age, from 41% of Gen Z to 43% of Millennials, 48% of Gen X, and 53% of Baby Boomers, suggesting older patients may be more open to reducing administrative burden through automation.

When it came to children’s healthcare, however, patients showed more hesitation. Just 29% of parents said they would allow AI to complete their child’s intake forms, reflecting a more cautious approach when sensitive information involves dependents.

Generational differences were also clear among parents. About 33% of Millennial parents expressed openness to AI-assisted intake for their children, compared to the following:

  • Gen X parents (27%)
  • Gen Z parents (22%)
  • Baby Boomer parents (20%)

These gaps point to the importance of transparency and trust when introducing AI-driven solutions in private practices.

How legacy intake infrastructure costs practices every week

Behind the scenes, intake workflows create a significant operational burden that impacts staff efficiency and care delivery.

Infographic titled “The administrator’s ledger” showing the operational impact of medical intake paperwork on healthcare practices. It states that practices spend 13 hours per week on intake paperwork, equal to nearly four months of full-time work annually, and that 28% of intake forms contain errors requiring staff intervention. The infographic highlights consequences of intake errors, including billing or insurance disputes (60%), patient complaints (47%), delayed procedures (46%), and adverse clinical events (18%). It also outlines barriers to AI-powered intake adoption, led by data security and liability concerns (27%), and notes that 62% of providers believe AI-driven intake could reduce administrative burden.

Healthcare practices spent an average of 13 hours per week processing, correcting, or following up on intake paperwork, which equated to nearly 4 months of full-time work each year. The burden was even higher in certain settings, including 20 hours per week in urgent care, 16.5 hours in primary care and family medicine, and 15 hours in internal medicine.

Errors in intake forms added to the strain. About 28% of forms contained mistakes requiring staff intervention before the patient could be seen, with rates broken down by specialty below:

  • Urgent care (30%)
  • Internal medicine (29%)
  • Primary care/family medicine (28%)

These inefficiencies slowed workflows and increased administrative overhead.

In some cases, the consequences extended beyond operations. Around 18% of healthcare practices reported that intake errors had led to an adverse clinical event, such as the wrong medication being administered or an allergic reaction. This risk was most pronounced in multi-specialty and hospital systems at 27%, followed by primary care/family medicine at 19% and mental health at 10%, highlighting the critical role accurate intake plays in patient safety.

The future of intake is efficiency with trust

Reducing administrative burden in healthcare starts with rethinking how intake is handled. Patients are clearly frustrated by repetitive paperwork, and providers are spending significant time managing processes that could be streamlined. At the same time, openness to AI solutions signals an opportunity, but only if trust and transparency are prioritized.

Private practices that modernize intake workflows can improve both patient experience and operational efficiency. Thoughtful adoption of AI and automation has the potential to reduce errors, save time, and create a smoother path to care. As expectations continue to evolve, practices that strike the right balance between innovation and patient comfort will be best positioned to lead.

Methodology

Tebra conducted two surveys to explore how Americans experience medical intake paperwork and how they feel about the prospect of AI taking it over. Among patients, we surveyed 703 Americans across four generations: Gen Z (15%), Millennials (49%), Gen X (26%), and Baby Boomers (11%). The patient survey explored how often they fill out intake forms, how long it takes, how accurate the information they provide is, and how comfortable they would be with an AI assistant pulling from their previous visit records, insurance files, health apps, or wearable devices to complete those forms. 

Among providers, we surveyed 298 US healthcare professionals spanning practice sizes from solo practitioners to large health systems and specialties including primary care, internal medicine, urgent care, mental health, and multi-specialty/hospital systems. The provider survey explored staff time spent on intake paperwork, error rates, the clinical and operational consequences of intake errors, and openness to adopting AI-powered intake. Data was collected in April 2026. Figures may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Tebra

Tebra, headquartered in Southern California, empowers private healthcare practices with AI and automation to drive growth, streamline care, and boost efficiency. Our all-in-one EHR and billing platform delivers everything you need to attract and engage your patients, including digital patient intake, online scheduling, reputation management, and digital communications.

Inspired by "vertebrae," our name embodies our mission to be the backbone of healthcare success. With over 165,000 providers and 190 million patient records, Tebra is redefining healthcare through innovation and a commitment to customer success. We're not just optimizing operations — we're ensuring private practices thrive.

Fair use statement

This content is available for noncommercial use only. If shared, please include proper attribution and a link back to Tebra.

FAQs

Medical practices spend an average of 13 hours per week processing, correcting, or following up on intake paperwork, which is equivalent to nearly 4 months of full-time work per year. Automating intake workflows through an EHR platform could significantly reduce this burden on administrative staff.  
Intake form errors affect patient care by causing billing disputes, delayed procedures, and in some cases adverse clinical events such as wrong medications being administered. Accurate, automated intake processes may help private practices catch and prevent these errors before the patient sees a provider. 
Private practices could improve the patient intake experience by adopting patient intake software that pre-populates forms using existing records, reduces manual data entry, and minimizes errors. Streamlining this process not only saves staff time but also reduces friction that leads patients to delay or avoid appointments altogether.

Written by

Erica Falkner, freelance healthcare writer

Erica Falkner is a writer specializing in general healthcare and well-being topics. She has worked to help market and promote healthcare organizations, and is a strong advocate for independent practices and the personalized and patient-focused care they provide.

Reviewed by

Andrea Curry, head of editorial at The Intake

Andrea Curry is an award-winning journalist with over 15 years of storytelling under her belt. She has won multiple awards for her work and is now the head of editorial at The Intake, where she puts her passion for helping independent healthcare practices into action.

Subscribe to The Intake: A weekly check-up for your independent practice