$2.8 billion Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement: What providers can expect
Medical providers who treated Blue Cross Blue Shield patients may be eligible for compensation from a groundbreaking $2.8B antitrust settlement.

Key Takeaways
- Blue Cross Blue Shield agreed to a $2.67 billion settlement to resolve antitrust allegations of limiting competition and inflating insurance prices.
- Approximately 6 million eligible subscribers who had certain BCBS plans between February 2008 and October 2020 are expected to receive around $333 each.
- Claim determination notices are being issued, with payments commencing soon; the claim filing deadline was November 2021.
If you’re a medical doctor licensed after 2009 — and you provided in- or out-of-network services to patients with commercial Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) coverage between July 2008 and October 2024 — you may have an opportunity to join the largest antitrust settlement in the history of the United States healthcare industry.
“It’s the vast majority of providers out there,” says Edith Kallas, co-lead counsel at Whatley Kallas, LLP, who represented providers in the 12-year long landmark case against all BCBS entities in the country as well as the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.
The settlement agreement (available here along with many other resources on the law firm’s website) spells out specifically what types of providers, including medical groups and facilities, are included and excluded. “Not every medical group or doctor is part of this case,” says Kallas. “However, keep in mind that you could have a medical group that has doctors who both precede and post-date the 2009 cut-off.”
Whether you're a provider, or a medical billing company who services them, let’s dive deeper into the allegations covered in the lawsuit and what providers can expect in terms of the settlement.
Allegations in the BCBS lawsuit settlement class action
The primary allegation against the Blues was that they allocated markets by using exclusive service areas to fix prices paid to providers through the BlueCard Program, a national program that allows members of one BCBS plan to obtain healthcare services while traveling or living in another BCBS plan’s service area, says Kallas. These anti-competitive practices resulted in underpayments to providers nationwide, she added.
“The primary allegation against the BCBS was that they allocated markets by using exclusive service areas to fix prices paid to providers through the BlueCard Program.”
As part of its investigation, Whatley Kallas and its co-counsel spent approximately $100 million to develop the largest collection of healthcare claims data in any case in history. Part of the money was also spent on hiring healthcare antitrust economists to evaluate that data and develop econometric models for the case.
In addition, the law firm assembled a work group of providers, including representation from large healthcare systems, teaching hospitals, rural hospitals, medical practices, ancillary providers, and medical and hospital associations that provided input throughout the process.
Outcomes of the BCBS lawsuit settlement class action
The settlement includes a $2.8 billion cash payment into a settlement fund. It also requires all 33 independent Blues to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in system improvements for the benefit of providers, including timely communication and payment, transparent decision-making and dealings with third parties, and timely claims status updates. The goal? Alleviate and address the resource-draining administrative burdens and inefficiencies that providers experience.
“What we tried to do is fix the BlueCard Program and enable additional contracting opportunities for providers out of area and establish a compliance process that keeps everything working like it’s supposed to,” says Kallas.
“What we tried to do is fix the BlueCard Program and enable additional contracting opportunities for providers out of area and establish a compliance process that keeps everything working like it’s supposed to.”
Optimize your revenue cycle workflow, increase insurance reimbursements, and reduce denials with Tebra's electronic claim submission tools. |
Providers opting out of the settlement
On March 4, 2025, many providers — including major health systems like Geisinger, Bon Secours Mercy Health, and CommonSpirit Health — chose to opt out of the $2.8 billion class-action settlement and file new antitrust lawsuits instead.
The new lawsuits challenge the 2024 settlement and its adequacy — with plaintiffs arguing that BCBS continues to suppress competition and harm providers financially. The plaintiffs seek treble damages under federal antitrust law, meaning they could potentially receive triple the amount of damages awarded to plaintiffs in the prior $2.8 billion settlement.
These lawsuits are now being heard in multiple courts:
- US District Court for the Northern District of California
- US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
The lack of competition in the commercial health insurance market continues to affect providers and patients. In 2023, the American Medical Association found that 95% of areas lacked a competitive market.
History of BCBS antitrust issues
This is not the first time BCBS has faced legal trouble for similar issues:
- 2003: Two doctors sued BCBS under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), alleging systematic suppression of physician reimbursements.
- 2007 Settlement: BCBS agreed to pay $131.2 million, along with a set of business practice changes including the reduction of prior authorization requirements.
- 2012: A chiropractor’s lawsuit revived allegations of BCBS operating like a cartel, with him alleging the Blue Shield Association rule that bans affiliates from selling insurance in each other’s service areas violated the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. BCBS settled the case with health plan sponsors in 2020; however, plaintiffs in the new lawsuits are arguing that BCBS has failed to meaningfully change their practices since then — eventually leading to the current $2.8 billion settlement.
What to expect next
How much money might providers receive as a result of this settlement? While there is a plan of distribution based on each provider’s allowed amounts and other factors, the final dollar amount will depend largely on how many providers claim into the settlement, says Kallas. “The number of professionals who participate is going to matter a lot because anything that’s left over does not revert back to the Blues,” she says. “It goes to the class members.”
Kallas advises providers to monitor the Whatley Kallas website for up-to-date information on the court order finalizing the settlement and important deadlines to consider.
You Might Also Be Interested In
Crack the code for beating medical billing challenges with this free workbook — which provides tips around improving patient collections, streamlining claims submissions, and reducing rejections and denials.
- Current Version – Mar 14, 2025Written by: Jean LeeChanges: This article was updated to include the most relevant and up-to-date information available.
Stay Ahead with Expert Healthcare & Billing Insights
Get the latest industry updates, financial tips, and expert strategies — delivered straight to your inbox.
Suggested for you
Stay Ahead with Expert Healthcare & Billing Insights
Get the latest industry updates, financial tips, and expert strategies — delivered straight to your inbox.