
- Comments on the CY 2027 rule are due by 11:59 p.m. ET on September 14, 2026.
- Non-APM conversion factor drops from $33.40 to $32.84, a 1.68% cut.
- Same-day E/M with a procedure would pay 100% for one service, 50% for others.
- G2211 would become a modifier: 16% boost, or 32% for eligible ACO clinicians.
- CMS proposes its first major practice expense methodology update in ~20 years.
- Final rule publishes this fall and takes effect January 1, 2027.
TL;DR
Review CMS's CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule now and submit comments on the six changes most likely to affect your practice — payment cuts, E/M and G2211 policy shifts, and remote monitoring rules — before the September 14, 2026 deadline.
Each year, the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule shapes how Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays private practices, making the agency’s proposed updates more than just another regulatory announcement. Most recently, the calendar year (CY) 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule includes several significant policy changes that could affect physician reimbursement as well as quality reporting and the financial health of medical practices. While the rule isn’t final, CMS is accepting public comments before making its decisions—giving physicians and practice leaders an opportunity to influence the policies that will impact their patients and businesses.
Why should physicians submit comments to CMS?
The public comment period gives providers and practice leaders an opportunity to share real-world perspectives before CMS issues the final rule. Feedback from clinicians can help identify unintended consequences, highlight implementation challenges, and recommend practical improvements that better support patient care and the sustainability of medical practices. By participating in the comment process, providers can help ensure that the final Medicare Physician Fee Schedule reflects the realities of clinical practice and addresses the needs of both providers and the patients they serve.
When are comments due for the 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule?
Comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule are due by 11:59 p.m. ET on September 14, 2026. To submit comments, visit Regulations.gov – CMS-1848-P Comment Submission. Here’s a press release about the rule for reference.
Who should comment on the CMS proposed rule?
CMS is accepting feedback from providers, practice leaders, professional societies, healthcare organizations, and members of the public. The agency will publish a final rule later this fall that will take effect on January 1, 2027.
What are the most important topics on which providers should comment?
The CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule includes many topics that could directly affect private practices. However, here are six of the most important ones to review and consider.
Same-day evaluation and management (E/M) payment reductions
In its CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, CMS proposes to reduce Medicare payment when a physician (or another clinician in the same practice) furnishes a separately identifiable office/outpatient E/M visit on the same day as a procedure with a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global period. Under the proposal, Medicare would pay the higher-valued service at 100% and all additional same-day surgical procedures or E/M visits at 50%. What types of practices might feel the impact of this proposal most significantly? Specialties that frequently report modifier -25 with E/M services, including:
- Dermatology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- General surgery
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopedics
- Primary care
- Urology
As you prepare comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, consider questions such as:
- Does a 50% payment reduction accurately reflect the additional work involved in providing a separately identifiable E/M service on the same day as a procedure?
- How would this policy affect your practice’s financial sustainability, workflow, and ability to provide timely, comprehensive patient care?
- Would this proposal discourage you or other providers from addressing multiple patient concerns in a single visit, potentially leading to unnecessary follow-up appointments?
Medicare physician payment rates
In its CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, CMS proposes to reduce Medicare physician payment rates by lowering the Physician Fee Schedule conversion factor. For clinicians who do not participate in a qualifying Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM), the proposed conversion factor would decrease from $33.40 to $32.84, a 1.68% reduction. For qualifying APM participants, the conversion factor would decrease from $33.57 to $33.17, a 1.19% reduction.
Although the proposed reductions may appear modest, they come at a time when many private practices continue to face rising labor, supply, technology, and compliance costs. Because the conversion factor affects payment for nearly every service billed under the Physician Fee Schedule, even a small percentage decrease can translate into significant revenue losses over the course of a year.
As you prepare comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, consider questions such as:
- Do the proposed payment updates adequately account for rising practice costs and inflation facing independent medical practices?
- How would a 1%–2% reduction in Medicare reimbursement affect your practice’s ability to maintain staffing, invest in technology, and care for Medicare patients?
- Should CMS or Congress consider additional payment adjustments to better support physician practices while the agency continues its transition to value-based care?
Practice expense methodology changes
In its CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, CMS proposes the first major update to the practice expense methodology in nearly two decades. Specifically, the agency proposes to incorporate newer data on clinical labor, medical equipment, supplies, and indirect practice costs to better reflect how physician practices operate today. However, while CMS frames the change as a modernization effort, the practical impact is that some specialties may see payment increases while others may see decreases.
As you prepare comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, consider questions such as:
- Are there aspects of your specialty’s practice expenses that CMS’s updated methodology fails to capture?
- Does the proposed methodology accurately reflect your practice’s current overhead costs, including staffing, equipment, and supplies?
- Would the proposed changes improve or reduce your practice’s ability to provide high-quality, accessible care to Medicare patients?
E/M Visit Complexity Add-On (HCPCS code G2211)
For 2027, CMS proposes replacing HCPCS code G2211 with a modifier-based approach. The proposed modifier would increase payment for the associated E/M visit by 16%, replacing the current flat-rate add-on payment. In its CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, CMS also proposes a second modifier that would provide a 32% payment increase for eligible clinicians participating in certain accountable care organizations (ACOs), recognizing the additional resources associated with longitudinal care and accountability for quality and total cost of care.
As you prepare comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, consider questions such as:
- Does CMS’s proposed approach adequately recognize the administrative, coordination, and technology investments required to manage complex patients over time?
- Does converting G2211 from a flat add-on payment to a percentage-based modifier more accurately reflect the resources required for longitudinal patient care?
- Will the proposed payment structure appropriately support private practices that provide comprehensive, ongoing care but are not participating in ACO models?
Remote monitoring
In its 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, CMS proposes several changes to Medicare’s remote patient monitoring (RPM) and remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) policies for 2027, including:
- Limiting RTM to established patients
- Requiring a separately reportable initiating visit before services begin
- Requiring clinical staff employed by the billing practice (rather than outside vendor staff) to furnish the RPM and RTM services
- Revising the valuation of RPM and RTM codes to better reflect current resource costs
CMS is also seeking feedback on a potential restructuring of RPM and RTM coding, including replacing existing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes with new HCPCS G-codes and creating a more standardized payment framework.
As you prepare comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, consider questions such as:
- Do CMS’s proposed requirements accurately reflect the resources needed to deliver effective remote monitoring, including technology, staffing, patient outreach, and care coordination?
- Will limiting RPM and RTM reimbursement to practice-employed clinical staff improve program integrity, or will it create barriers that prevent private practices from offering remote monitoring services?
- Would restructuring RPM and RTM codes improve transparency and reduce improper billing, or would it create unnecessary complexity for practices and patients?
CPT code authority
CMS seeks public input on whether it should reconsider its long-standing reliance on theAmerican Medical Association (AMA)’s CPT code development process and related valuation recommendations. CMS is asking stakeholders to comment on whether the current physician coding and valuation system—particularly the relationship between CMS, CPT, and the AMA/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee—continues to be the best approach for Medicare payment policy. CMS is seeking feedback on potential alternatives that could improve transparency, competition, innovation, and accuracy in how physician services are coded and valued.
As you prepare comments on the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, consider questions such as:
- Does the current CPT and valuation process accurately reflect the resources, complexity, and clinical work required to deliver modern patient care?
- What alternative approaches could CMS use to ensure physician payment rates are based on reliable, objective, and regularly updated data?
- Would moving away from AMA-managed coding and valuation processes improve transparency and fairness, or create new challenges for providers and practices?





